We already identified in this thread that it’s the disk read over loads that are showing the issue in C10 on my system. You seem to be obsessed that the only thing affecting a DAWs performance is plug ins. Why anyone would think it does is a mystery to me. This is just further evidence that the DAW has very little influence on the performance of plugins.

I’ve gotten the same result with various versions of LPX going back quite a ways. I see you did you test on Logic Pro X 10.4.4.Īny chance you could run your test on Logic Pro X 10.4.5 to see if it’s the new version that provides better performance?īetter performance than what? Anyway, I get the same result with 10.4.5. Me doing your test just Compares my Hardware to your Hardware and that’s irrelevant. If that’s the best Cubase can do on my hardware… and the other DAWs have optimizations and settings that are working better then perhaps Cubase could improve in that department. Try my test and see if you observe a difference. These days, with hybrid buffers and asio guard, setting your buffer size to 512 does not mean you are using a buffer size of 512.

I understand, but that’s different than saying you used the same conditions in all 3 tests.

While keeping the buffer setting at 512 I tried all different combination of options in the settings panel and that was the best Cubase could produce. Those DAWs have performance-related preferences that can affect a test like this. It’s possible you’ve found a difference, but the more likely explanation is you’ve got some settings different in your tests. My performance tests don’t show a difference.

Reverse sound in logic pro 10.4